Scholarly Communications

A short guide for early career researchers providing recommendations on how to identify venues where to submit work for publication. It clarifies the difference between various publication venues (i.e. journals, conferences, etc.), and gives pointers on how to identify suitable ones.

Publication in a peer-reviewed journal is the goal of any research project. One of the most important (and possibly the least understood) aspects of the publication process is the choice of a suitable journal that is likely to accept your work. Detailed information and tips and tricks to success are given in this editorial.

Available for business journals, this directory includes information on the journals' acceptance rates, publication guidelines, number of copies required, types of review processes, number of internal and external reviewers, time required for review, and availability of reviewers' comments.

Google Scholar Metrics provide an easy way for authors to quickly gauge the visibility and influence of recent articles in scholarly publications. Scholar Metrics summarize recent citations to many publications, to help authors as they consider where to publish their new research.

A freely available, web-based tool that uses keywords to match a provided abstract or title to relevant journals, articles, or reviewers from PubMed.

A public portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained Elsevier's Scopus® database.

The changing mechanisms of scholarly publishing may make it difficult for you to determine where to publish the results of your research or creative works. In order to assist you in making the best decisions for your work, and to avoid journals that may not be credible, the William H. Hannon Library has developed a rubric for the evaluation of journals. Our focus during the development of this tool was specifically to address the concerns of our Loyola Marymount University faculty about Open Access journals, but this rubric may be applied more broadly to any kind of journal.

COPE develops resources for editors and publishers on publication ethics, including guidance on retraction, plagiarism and other ethical concerns.

Perma.cc is a free web archiving service for legal and academic citations founded by the Harvard Library Innovation Lab to prevent link rot when publishing.

The Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing outlines guidelines for ethical and transparent scholarly publishing. Key principles include clear website information, copyright and licensing policies, publication ethics, peer review processes, access details, ownership transparency, editorial team information, and business practices.